Antivirus Bypass

[introduction]

​

AV Evasion Methodology​

Currently, AVs use different methods for checking if a file is malicious or not, static detection, dynamic analysis, and for the more advanced EDRs, behavioural analysis.

Static detection​

Static detection is achieved by flagging known malicious strings or arrays of bytes in a binary or script, and also extracting information from the file itself (e.g. file description, company name, digital signatures, icon, checksum, etc.). This means that using known public tools may get you caught more easily, as they've probably been analyzed and flagged as malicious. There are a couple of ways of getting around this sort of detection:

• • Encryption

If you encrypt the binary, there will be no way for AV of detecting your program, but you will need some sort of loader to decrypt and run the program in memory.

• • Obfuscation

Sometimes all you need to do is change some strings in your binary or script to get it past AV, but this can be a time-consuming task depending on what you're trying to obfuscate.

• • Custom tooling

If you develop your own tools, there will be no known bad signatures, but this takes a lot of time and effort.

Link:

To view the content, you need to Sign In or Register.

Click to read more...

 

[akasls]

let see

 

[mozartpeace]

​

AV Evasion Methodology​

Currently, AVs use different methods for checking if a file is malicious or not, static detection, dynamic analysis, and for the more advanced EDRs, behavioural analysis.

Static detection​

Static detection is achieved by flagging known malicious strings or arrays of bytes in a binary or script, and also extracting information from the file itself (e.g. file description, company name, digital signatures, icon, checksum, etc.). This means that using known public tools may get you caught more easily, as they've probably been analyzed and flagged as malicious. There are a couple of ways of getting around this sort of detection:

• • Encryption

If you encrypt the binary, there will be no way for AV of detecting your program, but you will need some sort of loader to decrypt and run the program in memory.

• • Obfuscation

Sometimes all you need to do is change some strings in your binary or script to get it past AV, but this can be a time-consuming task depending on what you're trying to obfuscate.

• • Custom tooling

If you develop your own tools, there will be no known bad signatures, but this takes a lot of time and effort.

Link:
*** Hidden text: cannot be quoted. ***
​

View attachment 87049

nice try

 

[Hacker_2333]

Thanx

 

[DGDGRXD]

lets see

 

[legassa]

​

AV Evasion Methodology​

Currently, AVs use different methods for checking if a file is malicious or not, static detection, dynamic analysis, and for the more advanced EDRs, behavioural analysis.

Static detection​

Static detection is achieved by flagging known malicious strings or arrays of bytes in a binary or script, and also extracting information from the file itself (e.g. file description, company name, digital signatures, icon, checksum, etc.). This means that using known public tools may get you caught more easily, as they've probably been analyzed and flagged as malicious. There are a couple of ways of getting around this sort of detection:

• • Encryption

If you encrypt the binary, there will be no way for AV of detecting your program, but you will need some sort of loader to decrypt and run the program in memory.

• • Obfuscation

Sometimes all you need to do is change some strings in your binary or script to get it past AV, but this can be a time-consuming task depending on what you're trying to obfuscate.

• • Custom tooling

If you develop your own tools, there will be no known bad signatures, but this takes a lot of time and effort.

Link:
*** Hidden text: cannot be quoted. ***
​

View attachment 87049

Thanks

 

[legassa]

​

AV Evasion Methodology​

Currently, AVs use different methods for checking if a file is malicious or not, static detection, dynamic analysis, and for the more advanced EDRs, behavioural analysis.

Static detection​

Static detection is achieved by flagging known malicious strings or arrays of bytes in a binary or script, and also extracting information from the file itself (e.g. file description, company name, digital signatures, icon, checksum, etc.). This means that using known public tools may get you caught more easily, as they've probably been analyzed and flagged as malicious. There are a couple of ways of getting around this sort of detection:

• • Encryption

If you encrypt the binary, there will be no way for AV of detecting your program, but you will need some sort of loader to decrypt and run the program in memory.

• • Obfuscation

Sometimes all you need to do is change some strings in your binary or script to get it past AV, but this can be a time-consuming task depending on what you're trying to obfuscate.

• • Custom tooling

If you develop your own tools, there will be no known bad signatures, but this takes a lot of time and effort.

Link:
*** Hidden text: cannot be quoted. ***
​

View attachment 87049

Thanks

 

[gfdghdfhd]

lets seee