HI all. I am a new member of this community and I was wondering where is the correct place to ask questions about spamming/phishing? I've been modifying a copy hulu . com/ for personal use to see how long it will avoid detection. I'm nearly completed it as I've removed all trackers/anti-spam measures and added the logic it needs. I want to have all my bases covered before I host it to avoid google's red-screen warning because I've read that once it is flagged you have to contact google to get it removed. I welcome anyone to share there thoughts/experiences. Some things I have pondered include:
QUESTION #1 ā
ā¢ Should all of the back-links be considered in my HTML when trying to avoid being 'flagged as deceptive' ?
ā¢ If so, what is the best solution? Would utilizing a 'URLshortener' be ideal to keep the back-links active while avoiding detection?
*back-links obviously can be removed or replaced with different links, but having links open to the correct content lends credence to the legitimacy of the site.
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
QUESTION #2 āā
ā¢ Are online HTML obfuscators worthwhile or can crawlers decode them easily? How about encrypting with base-64?
QUESTION #1 ā
ā¢ Should all of the back-links be considered in my HTML when trying to avoid being 'flagged as deceptive' ?
ā¢ If so, what is the best solution? Would utilizing a 'URLshortener' be ideal to keep the back-links active while avoiding detection?
*back-links obviously can be removed or replaced with different links, but having links open to the correct content lends credence to the legitimacy of the site.
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
QUESTION #2 āā
ā¢ Are online HTML obfuscators worthwhile or can crawlers decode them easily? How about encrypting with base-64?